Modified Flow Through Principle – newsletter 20 June 2017

[signinlocker id=”2544″]

Newsletter EconoServ, EconoBEE, EconoHR
 There has been a lot of activity in the past couple of months on the BEE front.

  • The B-BBEE Commission has issued an important practice guide covering the modified flow through principle (discussed in detail in this newsletter)
  • The Forestry Sector Code been finalized
  • The Property Sector Code has been finalized
  • The Mining Charter, although not an official BEE section 9 sector code, has been published and has generated lots of controversy.
  • A gazette has been published relating to thresholds of major BEE transactions that must be reported to the B-BBEE Commission

The Modified Flow Through Principle

What is it:
Let’s start with the flow through principle. It says, for example, if a company (A) is 24% black owned and it owns 10% of another company (B), then Company B is 2.4% black owned. (24% times 10%.)  If Company A is 100% black owned and it owns 25% of Company B, then Company B is 25% black owned (100% times 25%). There is no controversy over the use of the flow through principle, but the modified flow through is different!

The codes state the following;
3.4.1    A Measured Entity applying this Modified Flow-Through Principle cannot benefit from the Exclusion Principle.
    3.4.2    The Modified Flow-Through Principle applies to B-BBEE owned or controlled company in the Ownership of the Measured Entity.
    3.4.3    In calculating Exercisable Voting Rights under paragraph 2.1.1, and Economic Interest under paragraph 2.2.1 of the Ownership scorecard the following applies:   Where in the chain of Ownership, Black people have a flow-through level of participation of at least 51%, and then only once in the entire ownership structure of the Measured Entity, such Black participation may be treated as if it were 100% Black.
    3.4.4      The Modified Flow-Through Principle may only be applied in the calculation of the indicators in paragraphs 2.1.1 and 2.2.1 of the Ownership scorecard. In all other instances, the Flow-Through Principle applies.

What the codes are saying is there is an extra benefit to a black owned (at least 51% black owned and controlled company) in having shares in your company. That benefit will manifest itself in the calculations of certain indicators on the ownership scorecard.

These indicators are:
2.1.1 Exercisable voting rights in the entity in the hands of black people (4 points with a target of 25% plus one vote)
2.2.1 Economic interest in the entity to which black people are entitled (4 points with a target of 25%).

How it works:
The modified flow though allows us to increase the level of black ownership, from for example 51% to 100%. If Company A is 51% black owned and it owns 10% of company B, then instead of using the Flow Though Principle and stating that Company B has Voting rights in black hands of 51% times 10% = 5.1%, we can state that Company B has Voting rights in black hands of 100% times 10% = 10%. The 51% has been increased to 100% because Company A has at least 51% black ownership. From a points perspective Company B will earn 1.6 points for voting rights (10%/25% times 4) instead of 0.82 (5.1%/25% times 4).

The exact same will apply to indicator 2.2.1 for Economic Interest. It can be seen that the modified flow though principle has a significant effect on the scorecard. In line with clauses 3.4.3 and 3.4.4 it cannot be used for any other indicator, eg “Exercisable voting rights in the hands of black women”.

The controversy applies to the next section “Net Value”: Net Value is the most important indicator on the Ownership scorecard. Net value uses the economic interest value used for indicator 2.2.1 ie “Economic interest in the entity to which black people are entitled”. The question is which number must be used? The value based on the modified flow through or the standard flow though? The number used for Net value is the one that is printed on a BEE verification certificate showing percentage black ownership.

Using the above example do we use an economic interest of 5.1% (using the flow though) or 10% (using the modified flow through)? This makes a huge difference. If we use the modified flow through then 10% is sufficient to achieve the priority element status level of 10% (assuming all other requirements are met). If we use 5.1% then the entity will drop a level.

A better example is where a company is 51% black owned and it owns 51% of the entity. Using the flow through principle the entity is 26.01% black owned. Using the modified flow through the entity is 51% black owned. This has huge ramifications – EMEs and QSEs are automatically level 2 and generics are seen as 51% black owned. Any company that procures from these companies will earn procurement points via procurement from 51% black owned entities.

As always certain entities seemed to look for shortcuts. Their usual way to achieve 51% black ownership is as follows: The owner sets up a 51% black owned entity and he retains 49%. The entity is often a trust where he can exert indirect control. The trust owns 51% of the entity, with the original owner retaining 49%. The original owner owns 49% directly and 49% indirectly of the other 51%, ie in total 74% of the business. However the entity is seen to be 51% black owned and obtains its valid BEE certificate on this basis.

To us this sounded wrong. We saw the modified flow through as only applying to certain indicators – nowhere in the codes does it refer to actual levels of ownership. The objectives of the Codes and key principles seemed to frown upon not following the substance rather than the legal form of the codes.

What is right?
Most, if not all verification agencies recognise the use of the modified flow though principle in calculating levels of ownership. Many state on BEE verification certificates “Modified Flow Through Principle: YES”. SANAS, and previously also IRBA were well aware that the modified flow though principle was being applied by the agencies they were/are regulating.
Recently the B_BBEE Commission issued a Practice Guide on the subject: (the Commission only mentioned EMEs and QSEs.)

Its conclusion in paragraphs 12 to 14 was:
12. The introduction of this intervention brought about an exception to the extent to which entities can rely on the modified flow through principle to calculate black ownership. It is our view that this limits the calculation of 51% and 100% black ownership for EMEs and QSEs only through the application of the flow through principle, in line with the B-BBEE objectives outlined in section 2 of the B-BBEE Act.

13. While we do recognise that the Codes have not explicitly provided limitations of the applications of the modified flow through principle in claiming the enhanced recognition status for black owned and controlled EMEs and QSEs, it must not be applied to circumvent the policy objectives. Therefore, it is the effect of the application of the principle that in our view limits its application to the extent that it would undermine the objectives of the Act.

14. Therefore, the B-BBEE Commission in accordance with the requirements to advice on the interpretation of any provision of the Act as per section 13F(1)(a) and (3)(b) (ii) of the B-BBEE Act, hereby concludes that the modified flow through principle cannot be used to benefit from the enhanced recognition status reserved for 51% and 100% black owned EMEs and QSEs. Any contrary advice would be regarded as a misrepresentation of Entity B’s B-BBEE status which is an offence in terms of section 13O (1) (a) of the Act.

To emphasise, The B-BBEE Commission “concludes that the modified flow through principle cannot be used to benefit from the enhanced recognition status reserved for 51% and 100% black owned EMEs and QSEs.”

The BEE Commission is saying that an EME and QSE cannot use the modified flow through principle to state that they are 51% to 100% black owned to take advantage of the enhanced recognition to be an automatic level 1 or level 2.

As mentioned the guideline only referred to EMEs and QSEs and enhanced recognition. It did not mention Generics or other entities’ ownership levels. We would think that its conclusions for the modified flow through principle would apply to Generic entities as well, ie do not use the modified flow though principle to calculate effective ownership, but it does not say so.

What to do?
If your entity is a EME and QSE and it is relying on the modified flow though principle to state it is 51% or more black owned, the BEE Commission may take action against you for fronting.
If your entity uses the modified flow though for any other purpose to state ownership levels, you MAY have a problem.
In general if your entity’s ownership percentage is relying on the modified flow through principle, start planning now to change this and get a plan B.

Thresholds for Major BEE Transactions

The minister hsd published a gazette “Threshold for Major B-BBEE transactions”t. This was mandated by the B-BBEE Amendment Act. All transaction above a certain size had to be reported to the B-BBEE Commission and vetted by them.

This threshold has now been set at a (very low) R25 million.
What does this mean? All BEE deals worth more than R25 must be reported to the B-BBEE Commission, on the prescribed form (B-BBEE 18). This form requires you to give sufficient details to enable the B-BBEE Commission to note and likely approve the deal.

More importantly, this has been backdated to deals transacted from 24 October 2014. If you have done a deal worth more than R25 million, even two years ago it must now be reported to the B=BBEE Commission.

What if you don’t report a deal?
The gazette does not give a timeline as to when you must report on older deals. The point to be aware of is the B-BBEE Commission has the right to instruct any verification agency to deny you points if your deal has not been approved. They will probably give you a couple of months (due to their own work pressure), but you have no discretion to not report, unless you do not want to earn points or state your black ownership on your certificate.

What will the B-BBEE Commission Approve?
The Commission is obviously looking to approve deals that meet the criteria of ownership. There is no guideline other than the BEE codes. We know the B-BBEE Commissioner follows the codes.

Look out for our next information packed newsletter. Call us for expert help and advice to achieve successful transformation and not fall foul of the provisions of the Act.

Lianne and the EconoServ Team
EconoServ is a management consultancy. EconoBEE helps businesses become BEE compliant. EconoHR helps businesses manage Employment Equity and Skills Development. Through our managed services we are able to assist your business implement, Black Economic Empowerment, Employment Equity and Skills Development effectively.
twitter  Facebook  LinkedIN  Youtube
Contact Us
Tel: 011 483 1190
Fax: 011 483 1195
Forward to a friend
Know someone who might be interested in this email? Why not forward this email to them using [forward].
homeabout usservicesresourcescontact us
Copyright EconoServ – Helping you and the Economy Grow . All Rights Reserved.




You may also like...